The Dell Precision 3280 Compact is a mini workstation with impressive performance from its 14th-Gen Intel Core CPU and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada.
Dell’s Precision 3280 Compact is a mini workstation with impressive performance from its 14th-gen Intel Core processors and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada graphics.
View this post on Instagram
Dell Precision 3280 Compact Specifications
The Precision 3280 is a mini workstation built around Intel’s 14th-generation Core processors with a 65-watt base power rating. Many processor options allow for Intel vPro Enterprise remote management.
Expansion options are naturally limited in a tower this small, but they include two SODIMM slots for 64GB of DDR5 RAM and two M.2 2280 SSD slots. Certain configurations also include an M.2 2230 slot. It also offers dedicated graphics via an SFF graphics card up to the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation.
The full specifications of the Precision 3280 Compact are as follows:
| Processor Options |
|
| Operating System |
|
| Memory Options | 8GB – 64GB DDR5-5200/5600, ECC or non ECC |
| Storage Options | 2x M.2 2280 Gen4 |
| Video Card Options |
|
| Ports | Front:
Rear:
|
| Slots |
|
| Dimensions |
|
| Wireless |
|
| Power |
|
| Hardware and Firmware Security |
|
| Software Security |
|
| ECO Labels |
|
Dell Precision 3280 Compact Build and Design
The Precision 3280’s chassis has a volume of just 2.9 liters, making it a fraction of the size of a typical mid-tower with a volume of 30 liters or more. It measures 8.11 x 3.12 x 7 inches (HWD). The HP Z2 Mini G9 is slightly larger, at 8.6 x 8.6 x 2.7 inches while the Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra is 8.7 x 7.9 x 3.4 inches.
Visually, the Precision 3280 Compact looks and feels professional, prioritizing function over looks. Dell uses recycled materials in the chassis and packaging materials.
Beneath the front air grate is the power button, a hard disk activity light, a 3.5mm universal audio jack, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports (one with PowerShare), and one USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 Type-C. The latter is especially high bandwidth (20Gbps) and is good for connecting high-speed storage drives and capture devices.
Connectivity on the back includes an Ethernet jack, three USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A ports, two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports (one with PowerShare), three DisplayPort 1.4 video outputs, and the power connector. The dedicated NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada GPU has four mini-DisplayPort video outputs, and our unit has an HDMI port in the optional slot. This desktop is too small to fit an internal power supply, it relies on an external adapter. Our unit’s adapter is rated for 280 watts. Models with built-in wireless (which our unit doesn’t have) will have antenna connectors back here. (See the cutout holes at the bottom right in the photo below.)
There are no features on the sides of the desktop except airflow perforations.
Accessing the Precision 3280 Compact’s internals for upgrades involves removing the rear thumbscrews and the chassis cover. Here we see the processor heatsink and two SODIMM slots, which support DDR5-5200 and DDR5-5600 and both ECC and non-ECC memory. The SFF graphics card and the two M.2 slots are in the left compartment. Nearly every aspect of this little desktop is serviceable without tools.
Dell Precision 3280 Compact Performance
Our Precision 3280 Compact review unit is equipped with these components:
- Intel Core i9-14900 (24-core/36-thread) CPU w/ vPro Enterprise
- 64GB DDR5-5200 (2x 32GB)
- NVIDIA Ada RTX 4000 SFF w/ 20GB GDDR6
- 2x 1TB Gen4 SSD in RAID 0
- 280-watt power adapter
- Starting price: $969
- Price as tested: $4,313
Most Dell business products are sold through its channel partners, not online, so the price reflected above may very well be less especially if this desktop is bought in bulk.
Our maxed-out configuration is a far cry from the base model, which includes a Core i3-14100 CPU, integrated graphics, and just 8GB of RAM; it really isn’t a workstation when configured like that. The least expensive dedicated graphics option is the NVIDIA T400.
We don’t test compact workstations that often, so we’re using the HP Z2 Mini G9 (Core i9-12900K, Nvidia RTX A2000) and the Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra (Core i9-12900, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU) for comparison. They’re older but still very capable systems.
SPECworkstation 3
SPECworkstation3 specializes in benchmarks designed for testing all key aspects of workstation performance; it uses over 30 workloads to test CPU, graphics, I/O, and memory bandwidth. The workloads fall into broader categories such as Media and Entertainment, Financial Services, Product Development, Energy, Life Sciences, and General Operations. We are going to list the broad-category results for each, as opposed to the individual workloads. The results are an average of all the individual workloads in each category.
The Precision 3280 Compact started strongly, with dominating scores except in a few tests. The GPU Compute test suggests its RTX 4000 Ada is roughly on par with the ThinkStation’s RTX A5000 Laptop GPU.
| SPECworkstation 3 (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | HP Z2 Mini G9 | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Media and Entertainment | 4.65 | N/A | 3.89 |
| Product Development | 5.45 | 4.09 | 4.22 |
| Life Sciences | 2.31 | 3.53 | 3.69 |
| Financial Services | 4.67 | 4.36 | 3.49 |
| Energy | 5.55 | 4.24 | 4.02 |
| General Operations | 3.53 | 2.85 | 2.91 |
| GPU Compute | 6.01 | N/A | 5.56 |
SPECviewperf 2020
Our first test is SPECviewperf 2020, the worldwide standard for measuring graphics performance of professional applications under the OpenGL and Direct X application programming interfaces. The viewsets (or benchmarks) represent graphics content and behavior from actual applications, without having to install the applications themselves. The newest version of this benchmark went through major updates late last year, including new viewsets taken from traces of the latest versions of 3ds Max, Catia, Maya, and Solidworks applications. In addition, they added support within all viewsets for both 2K and 4K resolution displays.
The Precision and its RTX 4000 stayed just behind the Precision’s older RTX A5000, but in most instances the differences weren’t substantial. (We don’t have numbers for the HP in this test.)
| SPECviewperf2020 Viewsets (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| 3dsmax-07 | 81.96 | 90.02 |
| Catia-06 | 63.44 | 69.51 |
| Creo-03 | 122.52 | 118.21 |
| Energy-03 | 42.4 | 21.17 |
| Maya-06 | 202.42 | 225.13 |
| Medical-03 | 42 | 21.38 |
| Snx-04 | 277.27 | 528.13 |
| Sw-05 | 100.84 | 129.36 |
Luxmark
Another 3D benchmark we will be looking at is LuxMark, an OpenCL GPU benchmarking utility. The Precision again was just under the Lenovo and its RTX A5000. (We also don’t have results for the HP in this test.)
| Luxmark (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Hallbench | 13,617 | 14,226 |
| Food | 5,187 | 5,499 |
Blender OptiX
Blender is an open-source 3D modeling application. This benchmark was run using the Blender Benchmark utility. The score is samples per minute, with higher being better. The Precision’s numbers continue to suggest its GPU is on par with that of the ThinkStation.
| Blender OptiX (Samples per minute, Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | HP Z2 Mini G9 | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Monster | 1,905 | 954 | 1,617 |
| Junkshop | 934 | 584 | 981 |
| Classroom | 960 | 511 | 840 |
ESRI
Next up is the Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) benchmark. Esri is a supplier of Geographic Information System (GIS) software. Esri’s Performance Team designed their PerfTool add-in scripts to automatically launch the ArcGIS Pro. This application uses a “ZoomToBookmarks” function to browse various predefined bookmarks and create a log file with all the key data points required to predict the user experience. The script automatically loops the bookmarks three times to account for caching (memory and disk cache). In other words, this benchmark simulates heavy graphical use that one might see through Esri’s ArcGIS Pro software.
The tests consist of three main datasets. Two are 3-D city views of Philadelphia, PA, and Montreal, QC. These city views contain textured 3-D multipatch buildings draped on a terrain model and draped aerial images. The third dataset is a 2-D map view of the Portland, OR region. This data contains detailed information for roads, land use parcels, parks and schools, rivers, lakes, and hill-shaded terrain.
The Precision slotted between the HP and the Lenovo, an expected showing for its RTX 4000 GPU.
| ESRI (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | HP Z2 Mini G9 | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Montreal | |||
| Average FPS | 274.69 | 165.13 | 355.55 |
| Minimum FPS | 158.11 | 78.02 | 167.61 |
| Philly | |||
| Average FPS | 234.07 | 125.07 | 268.97 |
| Minimum FPS | 160.22 | 83.47 | 155.58 |
| Portland | |||
| Average FPS | 2,461.21 | 1,742.84 | 2,479.61 |
| Minimum FPS | 1,080.50 | 654.55 | 960.74 |
OctaneBench
Next, we look OctaneBench, a benchmarking utility for OctaneRender, which is another 3D renderer with RTX support that is similar to V-Ray. The Precision showed strong numbers here, often outdoing the ThinkStation P360 Ultra.
| OctaneBench (Score, higher is better) | Kernel | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | HP Z2 Mini G9 | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Interior | Info channels | 13.98 | 8.04 | 11.66 |
| Interior | Direct lighting | 44.10 | 25.04 | 42.00 |
| Interior | Path tracing | 54.48 | 31.60 | 52.64 |
| Idea | Info channels | 8.13 | 4.76 | 7.19 |
| Idea | Direct lighting | 34.03 | 18.73 | 32.47 |
| Idea | Path tracing | 41.09 | 22.77 | 39.83 |
| ATV | Info channels | 21.28 | 11.03 | 17.58 |
| ATV | Direct lighting | 44.90 | 25.61 | 45.28 |
| ATV | Path tracing | 56.61 | 32.08 | 57.31 |
| Box | Info channels | 10.94 | 6.50 | 10.04 |
| Box | Direct lighting | 41.50 | 23.38 | 40.49 |
| Box | Path tracing | 45.68 | 26.29 | 46.42 |
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test
We have also started running Blackmagic’s RAW speed test, which tests video playback. The Precision dominated the ThinkStation, especially in the CPU test. (We don’t have numbers for the HP in this test.)
| Blackmagic RAW Speed Test (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| 8K CPU | 106 fps | 54 fps |
| 8K CUDA | 88 fps | 63 fps |
7-Zip Compression
The built-in memory benchmark in the popular 7-Zip utility saw the Precision 3280 Compact performing very well, which is especially evident from the decompression numbers. Its 14th-generation Core i9 processor and dual-channel DDR5 memory show what this system can do.
| 7-Zip Compression Benchmark (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact | HP Z2 Mini G9 | Lenovo ThinkStation P360 Ultra |
| Current CPU Usage | 1,358% | 2,033% | 1,231% |
| Current Rating/Usage | 9.369 GIPS | 4.372 GIPS | 4.080 GIPS |
| Current Rating | 127.249 GIPS | 88.990 GIPS | 50.236 GIPS |
| Resulting CPU Usage | 1,438% | 2,049% | 1,251% |
| Resulting Rating/Usage | 9.130 GIPS | 4,864 GIPS | 3.998 GIPS |
| Resulting Rating | 131.115 GIPS | 91.456 GIPS | 19.995 GIPS |
| Decompressing | |||
| Current CPU Usage | 3,111% | 2,245% | 2,352% |
| Current Rating/Usage | 4.504 GIPS | 4.642 GIPS | 4.096 GIPS |
| Current Rating | 140.152 GIPS | 108.383 GIPS | 96.327 GIPS |
| Resulting CPU Usage | 3,121% | 2,341% | 2,344% |
| Resulting Rating/Usage | 4.575 GIPS | 4.772 GIPS | 4.178 GIPS |
| Resulting Rating | 142.789 GIPS | 111.692 GIPS | 97.915 GIPS |
| Total Rating | |||
| Total CPU Usage | 2,280% | 2,195% | 1,798% |
| Total Rating/Usage | 6.853 GIPS | 4.618 GIPS | 4.088 GIPS |
| Total Rating | 136.952 GIPS | 101.574 GIPS | 73.955 GIPS |
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
We run the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test against the system’s primary storage drive. The dual Gen4 RAID 0 drives in the Precision 3280 produced highly respectable numbers.
UL Procyon AI Inference
UL’s Procyon estimates a workstation’s performance for professional apps. On each system, we ran the test once on the CPU and twice on the GPU. We only have numbers for the Precision 3280 Compact in this test. Note how much lower the GPU scores are than CPU; clearly, this type of work is ideal for GPUs.
| UL Procyon Average Inference Times (Lower is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact (Core i9-14900) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact (RTX 4000 Ada, TensorRT) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact (RTX 4000 Ada, Windows ML) |
| MobileNet V3 | 1.21 ms | 0.44 ms | 0.56 ms |
| ResNet 50 | 9.83 ms | 1.56 ms | 2.36 ms |
| Inception V4 | 29.39 ms | 4.71 ms | 6.01 ms |
| DeepLab V3 | 31.21 ms | 4.28 ms | 13.33 ms |
| YOLO V3 | 72.78 ms | 4.99 ms | 9.52 ms |
| Real-ESRGAN | 2,923.68 ms | 280.52 ms | 255.35 ms |
| Overall Score | 137 | 963 | 626 |
y-cruncher
y-cruncher is a multi-threaded and scalable program that can compute Pi and other mathematical constants to trillions of digits. Since its launch in 2009, it has become a popular benchmarking and stress-testing application for overclockers and hardware enthusiasts. We only have numbers for the Precision 3280 Compact in this test.
| y-cruncher (Total computation time, lower is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact |
| 1 billion digits | 22.580 seconds |
| 2.5 billion | 77.587 seconds |
| 5 billion | 174.252 seconds |
| 10 billion | 383.813 seconds |
Geekbench 6
Geekbench 6 is a cross-platform benchmark that measures overall system performance. You can find comparisons to any system you want in the Geekbench Browser. We also only have numbers for the Precision 3280 Compact in this test. There’s not much to note except how much more powerful a real workstation GPU like the RTX 4000 is versus the CPU’s integrated GPU. (That’s part of the reason we said we don’t consider the Precision 3280 Compact a workstation unless it has a dedicated GPU.)
| Geekbench 6 (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact |
| CPU Single-Core | 2,971 |
| CPU Multi-Core | 19,230 |
| GPU (RTX 4000 Ada) | 129,038 |
| GPU (Arc integrated GPU) | 8,601 |
Cinebench R23
This benchmark uses all CPU cores and threads to generate an overall score. This is another newer test we run where we only have numbers for the Precision 3280 Compact.
| Cinebench R23 (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact |
| Multi-Core | 23,101 |
| Single-Core | 2,201 |
Cinebench 2024
We also started running the latest Cinebench test. Likewise, we only have numbers for the Precision 3280 Compact.
| Cinebench R23 (Higher is better) | Dell Precision 3280 Compact |
| Multi-Core | 1,361 |
| Single-Core | 130 |
| GPU | 12,748 |
Conclusion
Dell’s Precision 3280 Compact offers impressive performance in a chassis size of just 2.9 liters. It won’t top a full-power workstation, but few computers offer this much performance in such a little space. It performed well in our testing with its Core i9-14900 CPU and NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada graphics card. This desktop offers abundant connectivity, which is important considering its limited upgradeability, and ample hardware and software security, including Intel vPro Enterprise with select processors. Overall, the Precision 3280 Compact is recommended for those needing a compact high-performance workstation.
Dell Precision 3280 Compact Product Page
Engage with StorageReview
Newsletter | YouTube | Podcast iTunes/Spotify | Instagram | Twitter | TikTok | RSS Feed
